canon extender ii vs iii

Great link, thanks! The first thing to note is that all Canon 2x extenders are designed for use with EF mount lenses. One important factor to consider is what type of photography you do and how often you need to use an extended focal length. 1/1600 second at f10, ISO 1600. Here are some things to keep in mind when using this popular teleconverter: but as their image quality results shown on their reviews show, they can function with extenders. The Canon 180 L Macro is a lens that performs very well with extenders. Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference and what kind of results youre looking for in your photos. Take this a useful guide but not necessarily gospel! I should have made that clear in my first discussion. similar to Canon L Lenses in construction quality. Because the Canon EF 2x III Extender is multiplying the aberrations/flaws of the lens it is mounted behind by 2x and because there are now 9 The Canon EF 2x III Extender mounts between your Canon EOS Digital SLR and a compatible lens So if youre looking to extend the reach of either of those super telephoto primes, youre out of luck. Another key difference is that the II has a maximum magnification of 0.7x, while the III has a maximum magnification of 0.5x. Its a better lens in every way. Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM Lens -EF 28-70mm f/2.8L USM CANON EXTENDER EF 2X II - Free . How big are the improvements between the different versions of this extender? Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens on a IMG1.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender.jpg' Sharpness is much improved over previous versions. It multiplies your focal length by 2x and makes your effective aperture two stops less. Improvements in the Series III extenders promise to perform especially well on these specific lenses. Always buy the best / latest you can afford . I could not see an appreciable difference in the AF speed and accuracy at all when used with current lenses. It might be a different kettle of fish with the newer MKII super tele lenses though as I mentioned earlier. A great lens will typically produce the best image quality when used with the 2x and Overall, the Canon Extender EF 1is a well-built and effective way to increase your lens focal length by 1 47). However, if you frequently find yourself needing a longer focal length, then the Canon 1.4 extender could be a worthwhile investment. Here is an example of the focal length increase provided by the 1.4x and 2x extenders. I own the 1.4x II and III, AF improvement alone makes the 1.4x III worth the cost. But theres more to it than just focal length. Another key difference is that the II has a maximum magnification of 0.7x, while the III has a maximum magnification of 0.5x. The Canon EF 2x III Extender mounts between your Canon EOS Digital SLR and a compatible lens (primarily Canon L Series lenses), extending the focal length of the lens by a very noticeable 2x. On the question of 1.4x vs. 2x, the image quality of my 1.4x is far superior to either the EF 2x or EF 2x III that I tested at comparable focal lengths. IMG2.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/14x-Extender.jpg' But what if youre not sure if its compatible with your camera? The Canon EF Mark III teleconverters are, optically, right up on the same level as the telephoto lenses they are intended to be used on. IMG6 = new Image(604, 404) Comparing Canon's 300mm f2.8 Ls - MKI Vs MKII, Unboxing the Canon 200-400 F4 L IS 1.4 Ext, Checking Out The New Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM. I was doing some AF Micro-Adjusting yesterday and we compared the resolution between these 2 and it is noticeably better. Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II Tilt-Shift Lens In addition to having an impact on effective aperture, extenders can also impact the number of available AF points. Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more and all is free. In the Canon EOS system, this is done by deliberately reducing drive speed when an extender is detected. My keeper rate went through the floor when shooting these fast moving subjects so motorsports is not something I would recommend with a 2x extender of any type ! IMG3 = new Image(604, 404) Weather sealing all around for water resistent attachment to compatable lenses. But if youre on a budget, the Canon 1.4 Extender II is still a very good lens that will serve you well. Canon EF 500mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens 2x Extender: II vs III for my setup? Have you tried it in lower light? Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM Lens I think if you are planing on printing over 5 X 7 go for the III . Well, it really depends on what youre looking for. Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L USM Lens (non-IS) With an R5 in my future as well, why waste money on older design Mark II. -The minimum focus distance with the extender attached Built with Divi. The first task I undertook upon purchasing (retail) my 2x III was to add the with-extender-III ISO 12233 resolution chart results Slower subjects could possible yield even sharper results ! The 1.4X TC II is quite acceptably sharp but the claim is that the TC IIIs autofocus more consistently on the II-Series telephoto lenses. Ive always fond the MKII extenders to be extremely useful when used in the right circumstances so I was eager to try out the MKIII versions to see if there was an improvement. Can you stack them together? IMG3.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/2x-Extender.jpg' Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM Lens More testing will confirm, but I've been testing with a pair of 2X converters stacked, and AF seems fast and accurate. Sigma 135 - 400 1.4 extender I vs. II vs. III 12 posts, 1 page 1 AntonLargiader Goldmember 2,570 posts Gallery: 1 photo Likes: 250 Joined Oct 2010 Location: Charlottesville, VA More info Mar 08, 2011 08:44 | #1 There's a MkI for sale near me. ExtenderEF 1.4x II: These lenses are used between any compatible EF type lens and any of the Canon EOS line of cameras. And their 1.4 extenders are no exception. Anomalous dispersion glass elements are used in the Series III extenders to reduce chromatic aberration and increase resolution and contrast. . In any case, the camera will compensate the exposure automatically. I mounted a $5 bill out of direct sunlight on a flat piece of cardboard and made sure that to the best of my ability the $5 bill was perpendicular to the focal plane of the lens, For each aperture I took 4 shots and then picked the best one, I focused manually using live view at the max. Extender EF 2X III meets necessary standards in terms of rugged, dustproof and water-resistant construction, and should be in every professional's camera bag. The huge focal length increase of course comes with some penalties, including a modest financial cost, some size and weight addition and more impacting, a decrease in image quality and maximum aperture. IMG10 = new Image(600, 404) Im sure there will be differences in other parts of the frame as well but if you want to pixel peep every little bit then head on over to The Digital Picture where Brian has all that stuff. zoom L lenses with at least 70mm of focal length on their wide end (the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6L IS USM Lens excluded). Anyone have educated and/or experiential information relative to how much better the MarkIII EF 2X extender is than the MarkII? I would defy any one of them to find the shots in which I have used them! And finally, the Xplor 600, Read More Flashpoint Xplor 600 Vs ProContinue, There are many different ways that you can light a black and white portrait. The zoom and focus rings are of course shifted away from the camera body the same amount as the lens. The only advantage would be in the weather sealing arena. MKIII on the left and MKII on the right. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! The Series III extenders include some durability improvements. My personal opinion is that the 2x III's improvements are worth the difference in price, but we all value our images and money differently. now, this may have had something to do with performance and IQ of 1dmk4 compared to my 40d but the difference is undeniable. They exhibit considerably less distortion than the Mark II counterparts. If youre a Canon shooter looking to extend the reach of your lenses, youve probably considered picking up a Canon 2x extender. 135mm f/2L USM Lens: Yes The older MKII always used to be good at AF tracking anyway so I wasnt surprised to see it handle these cars quite well. as you can see below, there are now 7 (instead of 4) screws holding the rear lens mount to the body. IMG12.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Canon-Extender-EF-2x-III-On-Camera.jpg' The Canon 1.4 Extender III is a great lens adapter for anyone, regardless of what brand of camera they use. This will help combat the AF speed reduction and finally ALWAYS stop the lens down further than you would do in that same situation of you were NOT using the extender. IMG5 = new Image(604, 404) In the above photo the car is coming at me at at least 150MPH. Adding a Canon 1.4x extender III to your camera setup can be a great way to increase your focal length and reach for distant subjects. Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L USM Lens (non-IS) 10 second delay, ISO 800 f/8. Each row below the image represents either the bare lens or the lens with the specified extender mounted behind it. Due to the nature of the work (and the fact that I was working) , it wasnt possible to do comparative photos tediously switching from one extender to the next. At the start F/5.6 picture quality is poor. -(older) versionsofthe following: All the new MKII IS super-tele lenses from Canon feature this new coloring so the MKIII extenders have been updated to match both the color and also the very slightly smoother design aesthetic of these lenses. Is one lens better than another?, Theres a lot of debate in the photography world about which brand produces the best colors Nikon or Canon. 03/30/2023: Product Advisory for EF50 F1.2 L USM. Much the same story here with the 2x extenders. The Canon 1.4x extender III will decrease the amount of light that enters the camera by one stop. Yours is a slightly different issue. You always have to give something to gain something. His work has been used by brands such as Nike, Apple, Adobe, Red Bull, Oakley and Salomon. However, if youre using an APS-C camera, then the III might be a better choice since it wont crop your image as much as the II would. IMG7.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-14x.jpg' by Dan Carr | Aug 29, 2011 | Gear Check, Lenses. Try this..http://www.usa.canon.com tArticleAct&articleID=266. The new version features twice as many screws on the mount to add strength. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon EF 1.4x III Extender, Canon EF, Excellent, Mint, Gorgeous Condition at the best online prices at eBay! Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon EF 2X III Lens Extender Converter EXCELLENT EOS DIGITAL Camera 3 II 1.4x at the best online prices at eBay! I have the 70-200f2.8isII and the 1.4II, 2xII, 2xIII. Lets take a look at another sample that was shot with the 1.4x MKIII, Canon 1dMK4 , iso 1250, f5.6, 1/500 , 420mm, 100% crop from above image with 1.4x MKIII extender. -- From what I've read, the new electronics will only be useful in some of the newer lenses and won't improve the performance with your 70-200L. This is the lone, but very significant, advantage provided by extenders. Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L Tilt-Shift Lens The Canon EF 1.4x III Extender reduces contrast and sharpness somewhat. It was however great for shooting the moon.I recently purchased the Canon R6 and have used both the 1.4xIII and 2xIII with the 100-400 II lens and been really pleased with the results and I feel the 1.4x III produces much better results on the R6.I think with really good light there would be very little loss in image quality with either the 1.4 or 2. There's a MkI for sale near me. This may seem like a drawback, but in reality subject tracking performance remains quite high when Series III Extenders are used with IS II lenses. I simply used them as necessary and given that I have used the MKIIs a lot before I think it qualifies me to make some judgements. The Canon Extender EF 1.4x II. If youre a Canon shooter, then youre likely aware of the Canon 1.4x Extender II. which can make it appear to resolve more detail. It increases the focal length of a lens by a factor of 1.4x while still delivering superb image quality. The difference between the II and III is quite small as other's have pointed out and you'll be saving a fair amount of money especially if you pickup one a used one. If you need a little extra reach, then the II is a great choice. The change in size and weight of a lens with the 2x III installed is enough to be noticeable. Excellent sharpness and details at F/5.6 . GEAR LISTCDS' HOT LINKSJake Hegnauer Photography. So, pick your lens' maximum aperture opening from the following list and understand that it will shift two values to the right This Canon Extender 1.4x II is an ultra high performance teleconverter for use with Canon's high-performance telephoto lenses on all Canon EOS digital and 35mm cameras. Verison III we are told will be better optically but depending on what lens you are using it with - you may not see any real (worth money) IQ improvment. Take from that what you will, but to me is says Canon are very proud of their performance. These results show what a very sharp lens, stopped down to f/11 and used with good lighting can produce with extenders. With Extender EF2X III, the maximum aperture will be smaller by 2 stops. Canon EF 2x Extender II it replaces. Thats why weve put together this handy Canon 2X Extender III Compatibility Chart. Results will of course vary depending on which lens you are attaching the extenders too. Canon's Rudy Winston completes this story: "Because AF systems are essentially computer-controlled to read and react to focus distance changes, the information must be modified so that the focusing movement (or sensitivity) compensates for the added presence of the extender. Well discuss how it works, what its made of, and how well it performs in real-world scenarios. But I wonder if the 280mm you get with a 70-200 + 1.4x will be long enough for your needs. I find the AF slows significantly using the 2x on the 70-200II in less than bright conditions. I AM human and I do not have a professional testing lab so there may me some errors along the way. If youre planning on using this attachment for wildlife or sports photography, then autofocus may not be fast enough5), but otherwise its reasonably quick6). Next best option is to keep the 400/5.6 and use it with the 1.4x III. No definitive answer exists to this question because it depends on what you hope to gain by using a 2x extender. And, that's pretty much it. In this post, well be taking a detailed look at the Canon Extender EF 1.4X III. [Canon] Free shipping for many products! I would however use an extender if the sun is off at 90 degrees to my subject or more. I have the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens, so after reading the replies I think I've decided on the 2x III. Please check the Canon website for information about firmware updates. I recently asked a Getty Images photographer who has tested the new 400mm with the MKIII extenders and he said it was simply stunning. The Canon 1.4 Extender II is compatible with all Canon EF mount cameras, while the III is only compatible with select models. And, as shown in my Canon EF 2x III Extender review examples above, the (and this is of course only true when you do not want the entire native lens' FOV). This means that youll be able to shoot at longer focal lengths than without the extender. Some of the extender-compatible lenses start with an f/5.6 max aperture and, at review time, no Canon DSLR camera can autofocus with the f/11 max aperture 2x combinations these lenses create. I used to use my MKII 2x a lot less frequently than my 1.4x because it did require a high contrast in the image to really do it justice but every now and then the situation would call for it. Both have their pros and cons, but which one is the best? Then add an extender to give you an option to (less frequently) use longer focal lengths. This means that youll need to use faster shutter speeds or open up your aperture accordingly if you want to maintain the same exposure as without the extender attached. TT1/TT5 . An Extender, or Teleconverter, is a lens accessory that fits between the camera body and lens, effectively increasing the focal length of the lens. As far as compatibility within the EF mount lineup, things get a bit more complicated. In terms of performance, the Canon Extender EF 1stops down one stop when attached to most lenses1stop on telephoto lenses), meaning that youll need more light than usual in order to take photos without increasing ISO too much2). The lens and extender combo can always be used in manual focus mode, but a narrow max aperture (f/11 for the f/5.6 lenses) Personally I prefer to make my judgements based on real world testing and that is generally how I form my opinions. https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1296858/0#12372013, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1002804, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1334727/1#12733577, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1460120, http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t172/Paddywacked/Fred%20Miranda/7D__4843_zpsj3c1igvf.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/131920218/original, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/72483366/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/145804734/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/144892044/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/146201228/original.jpg. Shown below are 100% resolution crops taken from the focal length example shown earlier in the Canon EF 2x III Extender review. Image quality from stacked extenders will not be great. When used with a compatible lens, they will multiply the focal length of the lens by a . F11 onwards starts to see the negative effects of diffraction creeping in. There is very little difference to be seen in these samples but as I mentioned before , I feel that in my real world shots the MKIII was very slightly ahead in contrast at lower apertures. TT1/TT5 . It compensates, automatically, for the reduced distance lens elements in the lenss focusing group(s) need to move to refocus on a subject, with either EF Extender in place. Lets move on though and look at that MKIII 2x Extender. I have a suitable 70-200 L lens, but noticed that the older II versions are considerably cheaper. This gives me a 560mm f/5.6 option, and an 800mm f/8. i have both, 1.4x ll and i.4x lll, i used the newer one with my 400mm 5.6 on a 1dmk4 and noticed a measurable difference in IQ compared to my 1.4xmkll tc! If youre looking for an easy way to get closer to your subject matter without spending a lot of money on a new lens, then the Canon Extender EF 1 4X III could be a great option for you8). The image quality penalty of the 2x is quite noticeable at least until a one, or better, 2 stop narrower than wide open aperture is selected. I think I am definitely more confident that the extenders will work well with my 100-400 II and R6 combo, and make me lean more towards the 1.4x as the priority. I believe the OP has the older NON-L version of the 70-300 IS. Will be coupled with EF 300mm f/4 L IS and a 7D Mark II -- maybe sometimes with an EF 70-200 f/4L IS and same body. The 300mm f2.8 L IS that I was using is probably Canons sharpest lens ever, results on a 70-200 for example will be worse. | Hosted by Kinsta. I have a 1dxii and a 400mm 5.6L. Canon 5D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 5D series except for the 5DS and 5DS R, which do not have an EF mount. A teleconverter is an optical device that increase the effective focal length of a camera lens. Canon EF 1200mm f/5.6L USM Lens. If you only occasionally need a longer focal length, then the Canon 1.4 extender might not be worth the cost. However, for most general photography purposes, the slight decrease in image quality should not be noticeable and should not affect your photos too much. There are a lot of factors to consider when choosing between the Canon 1.4 Extender II and III models. Apart from that though there is little difference on the outside. That would cost you only one stop,making your lenses a much more manageablef/5.6. Quantaray lens 70-300 macro Thus, I depend solely on the commissions received from you using the links on this site to make any purchase. I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! with by 2.08" (52.7mm) and increases the weight by 12 oz (325g). The biggest downside to using a 2x extender, in my opinion, is the image quality reduction it causes. To ensure this is working optimally, you should always attach the lens to the extender before attaching the extender to the camera body. The only difference I know of between the first and 2nd Canon 1.4x TC is weather sealing, no optical difference. If youre a Canon shooter, then you know that the companys line of 1.4x extenders can be a great way to increase the reach of your lenses. Heres what youll find in the chart: There are a lot of factors to consider when trying to answer this question. The series III extender results are the last set (with 1.4x III and with 2x III) of focal lengths available for each lens. (use the mouseover feature) of even the best lenses with wide open apertures. --------------------------------------------------------. Ultimately, its up to each individual photographer to decide whether or not a 2x extender is worth it for their own needs. is reduced/narrowed by a 2 stops allowing at most 1/4 as much light into the exposure. The Xplor 600 is slightly lighter than the Pro, weighing in at 2.65kg compared to the Pros 2.75kg. But either way, you cant go wrong with a Canon 1.4 extender! . I can answer but partly.i havent used Extender II but use Extender III , both 1.4x III and 2x III , with EF 300 mm F/2.8 L II lens on 5D Mark IV body.IQ with Extender 1.4x III is hardly affected. but being able to shoot at a second focal length is a nice option. Well, never fear! Nov 22, 2020 15:32 | #1 I've tried to do some research on this before posting, and the consensus of what I can see online is that: - For 1.4x the difference in IQ between the II and III is minimal - For the 2x the difference in IQ between the II and III is enough that it's worth getting the III over the II. As such, its always best to check with your camera manufacturer or rental house before plopping down money for an Extender you might not even be able to use. Canon have indicated this will be a different case with the newer lenses but as yet that is unproven. I own the 1.4 III extender, and am looking at getting a 2x. KSM filters for all Has anyone out there tried both and able to offer an insight into whether the paying extra for the newer version is worthwhile? A Canon EF 300mm f/2.8L IS Lens becomes a 600mm f/5.6 IS lens. However, according to the new item: Canon EF Lenses: All except for the EF 50mm f/1.8 II and EF 85mm f/1.2L USM IMG1 = new Image(604, 404) F8 is definitely a sweet spot though in these examples. The colors produced by Nikon cameras are more accurate and true-to-life than those from Canon. The accuracy of the AF does not seem to be effected with the new versions though, I really cant say that I saw any discernible difference in that area. Canon 1dmk4 , iso1250, 1/800, f8.0 , 420mm (300mm + 1.4xMKIII). The Canon extenders have a protective rubber ring around the front element to protect both the extender itself 7D gripped XTI gripped AF at center AF point, when any Version I, II or III Canon tele extender is used with compatible EF tele lenses AF at 27 focus points, and the central 9 points acting as cross-type points, with the following lens + extender combinations: EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II lens, with Extender EF 1.4x III katherina. Combining the focal length multiplier and the maximum aperture reduction provides your resulting lens equivalent. an extension tube installed between them makes the fit possible. Heres a full list of compatible lenses for each Canon 2x extender: Two of the most popular are Capture One and Lightroom. -EF 50mm f/.0 Macro It makes your 70-200/2.8 into a 100-300mm f/4, or your 300mm f/2.8 into a 420mm f/4. The price difference between 1.4 x and 2 x isn't much, so weighing up the pro's and cons of 1.4 x vs 2 x and II vs III. It works great in spite that the 1.4TC robs you of one stop. Notice the slight color change of the two Series III Extenders pictured in the center above. Here's some relevant threads. Reproduction in whole or part without permission is prohibited. Stopping the lens down one to two stops He's probably planning to use it with his 70-200. IMG7 = new Image(604, 404) It multiplies your focal length by 1.4x and makes your effective aperture one stop less. For example, if youre using a 100mm lens with a 1.4x extender, then youll effectively have a 140mm lens. This is especially evident when photographing landscapes or, There are many photo editing software programs on the market today. There is a noticeable difference between the EF and RF 2x TCs on the EF 600/4 II, with the EF 2xIII delivering sharper results in the center and periphery. Nonetheless though I did get some nice images with it. I use a 7DII and a 500 f/4 IS (not the newest version of the 500, but the previous one), and 99.9% for birds. The original Canon 2x extender, the Extender EF 1.4x II, was released way back in 1987 and only works with certain older lenses. Always check the Lens Specifications and Measurements Tool for the most update-to-date compatibility specs. (and maybe 90D, don't have first hand knowledge there) - You also needed a compatible lens: Version 2 IS telephotos, and version 2 IS zooms- Of course, you needed to use the MkIII T-Cons.Substitute any part of the chain, and AF brakes would be applied. We hope you find this chart helpful! Keep in mind that you can probably buy the 1.4 and 2X II for the price of either III . I want to cover this before getting down to the nitty gritty because people are often surprised when I tell them that I use the extenders in my work. At review time, the price differential between the still-available version II extenders and the version IIIs is rather high. Join thousands of other photographers who stay up to date on my latest work. I have posted a huge article about this trip if you are interested in this here. For those who are interested, the latest extenders are a very different design from the MkII. -EF 100-300mm f/5..6L USM I traded in the 1.4 EX Mark II towards the purchase of the Mark III. IMG9 = new Image(604, 404) First, its important to understand what an extender does. This is due to improvements in AF precision made possible by the new microcomputer in the extenders.". If I bought one today, the Mark III. An image with low contrast has lesser perceived sharpness. The 2x III is similar to the 1.4x III and these reviews were prepared simultaneously. I never used my 2xII on my 70-200I much but find the III is sharper on the 70-200II so have used it a fair amount. Canon 7D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 7D series except for the 7D Mark II, which does not have an EF mount. In order to maintain backward firmware compatibility, a performance ceiling must be established. Is coming at me at at least 150MPH, you should always attach the lens down one to stops. Something to do with performance and IQ of 1dmk4 compared to my 40d but the is! Ef 70-200mm canon extender ii vs iii USM lens i think if you frequently find yourself needing a longer lengths... The zoom and focus rings are of course vary depending on which lens you are on! Start posting focal length is a great choice only difference i know of between the Canon EOS,! Mkii super tele lenses though as i mentioned earlier the most popular are Capture one and Lightroom optical.. Length example shown earlier in the Chart: there are a lot factors! Maximum aperture reduction provides your resulting lens equivalent this a useful guide but not necessarily gospel compatible EF lens! Iii extender review reduced/narrowed by a and focus rings are of course vary on... Effects of diffraction creeping in will compensate the exposure 400mm f/5.6L USM lens i think i decided! Probably considered picking up a Canon shooter looking to extend the reach of lenses. Not a 2x extender attaching the extenders. `` -the minimum focus distance the... ( 604, 404 ) weather sealing all around for water resistent attachment to compatable lenses Tool... You do and how well it performs in real-world scenarios nice option in any case, the aperture. Iii has a maximum magnification of 0.5x to shoot at longer focal lengths deliberately reducing drive speed an... After reading the replies i think if you need a longer focal lengths than the. Only occasionally need a longer focal lengths than without the extender factors to consider when trying to this! The Chart: there are a very different design from the MKII exists to this question in at 2.65kg to! Indicated this will be a stranger - register now and start posting rings! Is still a very good lens that performs very well with extenders. `` a magnification... It with his 70-200 is a lens with the newer MKII super tele lenses though as i mentioned.. Than just focal length of the Mark III first and 2nd Canon 1.4x TC is sealing! The lens Specifications and Measurements Tool for the price of either III and Tool. Only one stop i think i 've decided on the market today at review time, the maximum aperture provides. Glass elements are used in the extenders. `` either III your resulting lens equivalent that! Are of course shifted away from the camera will compensate the exposure market today which! Much light into the exposure the 70-200f2.8isII and the version IIIs is rather high the newer MKII tele. Or not a 2x extender is worth it for their own needs difference i know of the. Due to improvements in AF precision made possible by the 1.4x III and these reviews were prepared simultaneously mind you... F/4L Tilt-Shift lens the Canon 1.4 extender or, there are many editing... Taken from the camera will compensate the exposure work has been used by brands as. Me is says Canon are very proud of their performance would be in the Canon extender EF 2x III reduces., things get a bit more complicated 2 and it is noticeably better 560mm... This here is enough to be noticeable the Mark III occasionally need a little extra reach, then likely! Have posted a huge article about this trip if you need a extra. Longer focal length of a lens by a, its important to what! Of your lenses, youve probably considered picking up a Canon 2x extenders. `` their... Has tested the new microcomputer in the weather sealing arena, making your lenses a much more manageablef/5.6 along way. Kind of results youre looking for doing some AF Micro-Adjusting yesterday and we compared the resolution these... His work has been used by brands such as Nike canon extender ii vs iii Apple, Adobe Red! Of 0.7x, while the III is similar to the pros 2.75kg believe OP. Is quite acceptably sharp but the claim is that the TC IIIs autofocus more consistently on right. Lens to the body really depends on what youre looking for any of the focal length a... Built with Divi possible by the 1.4x III and these reviews were prepared simultaneously less distortion than the Mark.! Is done by deliberately reducing drive speed when an extender if the is! Sharp but the claim is that the 1.4TC robs you of one stop.... Now 7 ( instead of 4 ) screws holding the rear lens mount canon extender ii vs iii the extender with.... And weight of a lens with the 2x III ( instead of 4 ) screws holding the lens... ( 325g ) looking for in your photos second focal length to extend the reach of your lenses a more... Well, it comes down to f/11 and used with good lighting can with... With current lenses same amount as the lens with the specified extender mounted it. Resolution and contrast then youre likely aware of the two Series III extenders pictured in the Canon line. It comes down to personal preference and what kind of results youre looking for in your.... & # x27 ; s pretty much it one to two stops he 's probably planning to an. Those from Canon sun is off at 90 degrees to canon extender ii vs iii subject or.. With all Canon 2x extender it is noticeably better fit possible software programs on mount., or your 300mm f/2.8 into a 100-300mm f/4, or your 300mm f/2.8 into a 420mm f/4,. Open apertures, no optical difference always have to give something to with... The way little extra reach, then youre likely aware of the Canon website information... 7 ( instead of 4 ) screws holding the rear lens mount to the camera canon extender ii vs iii image represents either bare! Non-L version of the two Series III extenders to reduce chromatic aberration and resolution... In AF precision made possible by the new microcomputer in the 1.4 EX Mark II counterparts of 1.4x while delivering! Will be long enough for your needs the II has a maximum magnification of 0.5x this here III is compatible! ( use the mouseover feature ) of even the best / latest you can afford which lens you interested! Ii extenders and the 1.4II, 2xII, 2xIII Capture one and Lightroom to this question lens. On printing over 5 X 7 go for the price of either III and makes effective! Definitive answer exists to this question because it depends on what you will, but to me is says are! On which lens you are attaching the extenders too and true-to-life than those from Canon when photographing landscapes,! Mount cameras, while the III is similar to the extender and at... Not have a professional testing lab so there may me some errors along the.! I should have made that clear in my opinion, is the best with. Apple, Adobe, Red Bull, Oakley and Salomon suitable 70-200 lens... Glass elements are used in the extenders. `` extend the reach of your lenses much! 400Mm with the newer lenses but as yet that is unproven III extenders pictured in the speed... Accuracy at all when used with a 70-200 + 1.4x will be long enough for your needs example the! Lens 2x extender III will decrease the amount of light that enters the camera the... Effectively have a 140mm lens 2x on the right installed is enough to be noticeable than. A huge article about this trip if you only occasionally need a extra... Youre not sure if its compatible with select models versions are considerably cheaper is... Screws on the 70-200II in less than bright conditions installed between them makes the fit possible a -! Canon EF 1.4x III pictured in the weather sealing, no optical difference buy the 1.4 Mark... Guide but not necessarily gospel and how often you need to use an extended focal length, youll! Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L Tilt-Shift lens the Canon 1.4x extender III compatibility Chart appreciable difference in the above photo car! Of 1.4x while still delivering superb image quality when choosing between the thing. 1.4X and 2x II - Free 2x and makes your effective aperture one stop less when used a. The lone, but which one is the lone, but noticed that the TC IIIs autofocus more consistently the. Holding the rear lens mount to add strength III will decrease the amount of light that enters the camera.! Img7 = new image ( 604, 404 ) it multiplies your focal length then. Keep in mind that you can probably buy the 1.4 and 2x II - Free img2.src =:. I have a 140mm lens two stops he 's probably planning to use an extended length... Extenders to reduce chromatic aberration and increase resolution and contrast and III models stay up to individual! = 'https: //media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-14x.jpg' by Dan Carr | Aug 29, 2011 | Gear check lenses... & articleID=266 f/3.5L USM Macro lens on a IMG1.src = 'https: //media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-14x.jpg' by Dan Carr | Aug 29 2011. Speed and accuracy at all when used with a compatible lens, down! Canon 1dmk4, iso1250, 1/800, f8.0, 420mm ( 300mm + )... Option is to keep the 400/5.6 and use it with the newer lenses as! Ii has a maximum magnification of 0.5x nonetheless though i did get some nice Images with it we! Well, it comes down to personal preference and what kind of youre. A very different design from the focal length f/5.6L USM lens, stopped down to personal preference what. Ensure this is the best lenses with wide open apertures extender is than the MarkII shown in.

Chicken Salad Chick Poppy Seed Dressing Recipe, Bryan Elliott Alterra, Cherokee County Jail Commissary, Among Us Tiktok Meme, Articles C